Sunday, July 29, 2007

The Morality of Liberalism: Sodomy, Immorality and Hypocrisy


Hippy liberals seem to think they have the monopoly on values and ethics. Here at Neo-Conservative Lincs we beg to differ.

Posts left on this blog by such liberals suggest that I would leave a man dying on the street, that I support the Ku Klux Klan and am a fascist; this couldn't be further from the truth, but is typical of the politics of far left liberalism.

While conservatives stand for righteousness and moral values, liberals seek the destruction of basic standards of decency and morality. This is evident with Lincoln Gay Pride, an event to promote disgusting promiscuous homosexuality. Queer Lincoln Lib Dems Ross Pepper and Stephen Morgan attack our principled stance of opposing their sodomy, but myself and others find it deeply offensive the way they try to ram this immoral lifestyle down our throats. We simply represent the silent, suffering moral majority, who find their actions and behaviour thoroughly repulsive.

And the liberal loser's melodramatic hypothetical depiction of myself leaving a dying man on the street is plain ridiculous. Us conservatives believe in the lessons of the Bible, and in this case, the story of The Good Samaritan. Christian morality would dictate that I would come to the aid of my enemy, however, aren't liberals the ones who oppose Christianity and instead promote Paganism, Islam or any other vile opponent of the Lord?

Other aspects of liberal morality includes support for murdering innocent unborn children, letting rapists and murderers off the hook, and surrendering to Islamic fascism in the Middle East paving the way for it to advance unchecked across the globe.

Liberals having the moral monopoly? Don't take the piss.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Do you want them ram it down your throats ;)

Anonymous said...

how exactly are they 'raming' thier lifestyle down your throats?

Geoffrey Brooking said...

Its called pre4aching the religion of hate.

Anonymous said...

well geoffery, that dosent make any sense (which isnt helped by your spelling of the word preaching)

Homosexuality is not a religon, its just how people live, and you still havent answered the question. how are they 'ramming' their 'lifestyle' down your throats?

Anonymous said...

if you find their (our) actions so repulsive, stop watching!
stop taking part!

and if you don't want it rammed down your throat, perhaps you'd prefer it to be rammed up your arse...

oh... no room.. too full of shit already....

what a load of self inportant misguided twaddle you speak...

Lionheart said...

You gays are a bunch of hypocrites because if the centre-right, far-right or Christian group want to organise some festival then you gays are the first to complain but if it is a gay pride festival or some green hippy thing then apparently (according to you gays) it is ok.

As far as I am concerned if Peter Tatchell is able to say what he likes, then we the authors of this blog are also able to say what we like as well. Freedom of speech is a two-way street.

Anonymous said...

well why dont u organise an event then. get together with all your friends and discuss your problem with homosexuality, just make sure its well publicised so i know where to send the police to have you arrested for saying that gay pride should be firebombed.

i may not like your views but as a liberal i beleive in freedom of speech for all people in this country as well as freedom from Persecution

Lionheart said...

Quote: "just make sure its well publicised so i know where to send the police to have you arrested for saying that gay pride should be firebombed".

Anonymous you obviously don't believe in freedom of speech because you believe in arresting people for what they say. Typical liberal.

Anonymous said...

lionheart congratulations you manged to miss the end of what i said, perhaps you should go back and read it

and also thanx for not denying that you wanted to firebomb gay pride. unfortunatly for you their are laws against that in this country.

Lionheart said...

I didn't confirm it either.

And I did read the last part of what you said but it is the same liberal shite that is used to curb freedom of speech.

Anonymous said...

so if you are not confirming of denying it, why did you write on Ross Pepper's blog that, you hope that "Lincolnshire Pride gets a firebomb or two thrown at it"

Ben said...

"our principled stance of opposing their sodomy, but myself and others find it deeply offensive the way they try to ram this immoral lifestyle down our throats"

Pricipled stance??? Sounds like a tirade of intolerance to me. Dont you clowns realise its not the 1950s any more. You have no right to tell me or anyone how to live our lives, and I would have no intention of listening to you if you did!

I do so love your phrase "ram .....down our throats" Its so very freudian! Id give money on the pair of you being closet cases, who cant cope with your own sexualities so you have to disguise it in paroxisms of hatred and jealousy to anyone who has the balls to be who they really are.

Its familar ground boys, so many people, seeing who can shout the loudest, screaming homosexuality is evil, the scriptures condemn it, blah blah blah, and then Surprise Surprise, wouldnt you know it, they are found with a rent boy. Ted Haggard, the entire catholic church, there are so many!! And its funny how many of them use superstition to hide behind. I bet you worship that bitch Thacher too! How Camp!

Rumsfeld said...

Somebody else has previously left such a comment and I made quite clear how ridiculous that suggestion is at the time.

As I said then, I have spoken of my disdain for liberalism and extremist Islam. So according to your rules I am a closet gay liberal Islamic fascist suicide bomber. I can assure you I am not.

Anonymous said...

why do you connect 'being gay' with sodomy? many gay couples are celebate just as many single poofs, lezzas or bis' choose to be...

the age-old question: how many gays/lesbians or bisexual people have you actually tried get to know?

have you read 'the age of reason' by Jean-Paul Sartre?

'bad faith' my friends!

Anonymous said...

Sodemy is exactly what the gay's don't want us to bring up because that is what this all boils down to. I care for gays with a tolerance that is limited to being civil when trying to discuss our differences but it does not extend to accepting their actions to the point that we should be ok with making this union of male on male legal. If there is any male that wants to live with another male and be celebate that's fine. Who has a problem with that?The moment they want us to "tolerate" their "union" by giving it the seal of approval of marriage (so that they ultimately can feel better about their sodemy)then that's when tolerance turns to spineless permissiveness. The Lord drew boundary lines to define acceptable limits of tolerance. The Savior taught us that we need not tolerate evil. Giving sodemy a foothold on legitimacy by accepting Homosexual marriage would be permitting evil. Sodemy is the problem. Not having homosexual leanings in your DNA. My guess is many homosexuals could be much more happy in life if they only had the real courage to admit to themselves that they have a treasure in pleasure and they are trying to hide it by a coverup of "love" for another person when in fact they just want the orgasm that sodemy gives them.

I don't even consider someone gay unless they are a practicing gay. The language that we use is one of the problems. Most gays want to use the celebate gays as a reason to say "see, they are "gay" and they don't practice sodomy, why are you not OK with being Gay?". The fact is that most gays do commit the act of sodemy and that is what is wrong. It is not the temptation or tendancy (DNA driven or otherwise) toward homosexual desires. It is only if those desires are acted upon (Sodomy)that you are really a gay. By being OK with homosexual marriage we are saying that this action is OK. This is where the hipocrisy of liberals that want to hide behind celebate individuals with Homosexual temptations (non-practicing gays)comes out. They want us to be OK with their sodomy by saying that this celabate individual is being desciminated against. Why don't they just come right out and say they want everyone to think that there is nothing wrong with Sodomy. Then we could have a real discussion.

mike anderson said...

what a berk you are , never read such extremist drivel in my life , burn in hell mother fluckrt.

Freya said...

You said that the gays would probably complain if the Christians held a similar parade. I disagree. Gays don't hold the parade to voice their intolerance towards others, but rather to address the intolerance faced towards them. If people stopped caring, the gay communities would have no reason to parade and flaunt about.

I'm an Atheist, but I would attend and respect a festival or parade in which Christians or Buddhists or any other religion held in order to demonstrate their love of God or people, and how they wish to do good in the world. I act in a manner that is in accordance with (most of) the 10 commandments, but not because I fear a God. I do it because I believe they are true morals. The ones I don't agree with are ones that tell me God is the only true God, but whether I obey that one doesn't hurt other people. They are not the only morals, but they are true because they simply make sense to my rational faculties of ethics. Unfortunately, I obey the commandments better than most Christians. Call me a liberal or a hippie, but I don't support war. Thou shalt not kill. I don't support hate. Love thy neighbor. And so forth.

Anonymous said...

not being gay myself, i have taken a few moments to read the opinions of the neo conservatives........or should that be nazi's?
I note the comments they made regarding sodomy etc aand just wonder if their chauvanistic views are the same when it comes to lesbians having sex, or is that ok for two consenting lasses to have sex but not two consenting males.

Anonymous said...

I condemn sodomy (anal penetration), homosexual or heterosexual, on moral grounds because it debases both partners. The rectum is NOT a sexual organ. However, I see no role for the law in this private matter, except if the sodomized person is under age or mentally deficient.