Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Terrorist Mandela Statue Stands With Churchill on Parliament Square


Today a statue of Nelson Mandela was unveiled in Parliament Square. This is a disgraceful and shameless nod to political correctness.

Mandela's cause was justified in many ways, yet the way he and his comrades went about it was sickening. He supported the bombing of innocent white men, women and children, and despite being told by President P.W. Botha that if he publicly renounced violence he would be a free man, he refused, and until this day he has not renounced terrorist violence or apologised for his actions.

From this it is quite clear he is not the cuddly old man schoolchildren are taught to worship and revere, but is a brutal and murderous terrorist. We should also remember that as well as being a terrorist, he is also a communist anti-western bigot and therefore is a man undeserving of our respect. He also supported Saddam Hussein, awarded South Africa's highest military medal to Colonel Gaddaffi, and embraced and kissed the Arab Hitler, Yasser Arafat.

A statue of this barbaric man is not fit to grace Parliament Square and stand with truly great men such as Winston Churchill. Churchill will be turning in his grave. A deserving fate of this statue is to symbolically practice what Mandela authorised on unfortunate victims: necklacing. A tyre should be placed around the statue's neck, filled with petrol and set alight.

Then the thing should be pulled out the ground. This vile wetch of a man should be jeered, not cheered.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

OMG I couldn’t agree more, if one looks at this mans true past he is a dark character indeed, this man has blood on his hands and I thank the good people at Neoconlincs for flagging these facts. How many mothers of innocent murdered children have wept over acts perpetrated by this vile man? This is not a color thing as many liberals will try to portray. I have the up most respect for Ghandi and Martin Luther King who not only over turned and defeated anti democratic forces but whom managed to do so with the mantra of non violence. One final thing, very often tourists are encouraged to visit the tiny cell where this man was kept on Robin Island, it has become a kind of shrine to him, do they also get to visit the villa that he lived in the prison grounds? During most of the 1980’s, while his ‘comrades’ were in the cells he had a luxury life style which included trips out of prison to go for drives in the country. I wonder if the cell of Charles Manson will on day attract as many weeping pilgrims, even though he murdered fewer innocents than Mandela ever did. Violence against anti democratic and evil regimes, such as was the olds South Africa, is only permissible on military targets, that would mean you were a freedom fighter like in France during the WWII, when it moves on to killing innocents, like Mandela, it means your a terrorist in the same league as Hitler or Bin Laden or Mandela’s best buddy, Yasser Arafat.

Anonymous said...

One man's terrorist is anothers freedom fighter - You lot should know that - haven't you learnt anything at Uni (oh yeah thats why at least one of you failed!!!!)

Lionheart said...

Dear Anonymous,

"One man's terrorist is anothers freedom fighter." That is what people say when they support terrorists.

Rumsfeld said...

^^I never went to uni. Wish I had if that's what you learn there: I'd soon sort that out!

Anonymous said...

If you never went to university then what gives you the authority to write these awful and insulting articles.

Anonymous said...

i believe the fifth amendment does

Rumsfeld said...

"If you never went to university then what gives you the authority to write these awful and insulting articles."

^^Pure gold. In one fell swoop this demonstrates the liberal superiority complex saying that the millions of people who don't go to university are worthless and have no right to have their say. It proves that liberals have no concern over ordinary people and are more interested in lording their perverted views over the rest of us.

Anonymous said...

you lot are sick. racist, homophobic, authoritarian, imperialist capitalist hypocrites. what the hell is your problem?

you talk about how the world could be ruled by islamic fundamentalists, when your ultimate goal is to establish an evangelist dictatorship. basically, you're no different from pinochet, franco or mussolini.

i wouldn't be surprised if oliver peeke and james spark were behind this blog. they're certainly fuckwitted and bigoted enough.

Rumsfeld said...

I'll go along with capitalist. Capitalism is the greatest force of freedom the world has seen. And Western civilisation is the greatest the world has seen even though it is in significant decline due to the likes of you.

This site is not fascist. As we have said before, with its hippie green views and anti-market position, your New Age liberalism has more in common with fascism and neo-Nazism than we ever will.

I can't comment on behalf of people I don't know.

Anonymous said...

to be honest, you could be any or all of the above. how the fuck is capitalism about freedom? pinochet was a capitalist, and he killed thousands. he was very close to thatcher (who, in where most people have a heart

i must be everything you hate. i'm anarcho-syndicalist, gay, aspie, environmentalist, anti-nationalist, anti-racist, anti-authoritarian, working class and northern. oh, and i also happen to be atheist.

i'm guessing that you're involved with conservative future at the university of lincoln then. if not, then probably with UKIP or the BNP (also enemies of the working class).

(A) smash capitalism and the state

Rumsfeld said...

Sorry but because I didn't go to university and am an uneducated buffoon I don't know what an anarcho-syndicalist is.

And the writers of this blog believe British party politics to be pathetic and have no affiliation to any political party. No party is deserving of our support.

Anonymous said...

One of the sickest article and justification i ever read. Who ever wrote that needs to go to holly waters of all religieouns. you need brain sugery, i got some spare parts from donkey. go to kindergarden, men!!!!!!!!!!!!!! how on earht this pr freedom fighter could be labelled terrorist??

Carlos said...

You ppl are idiots, MAndela only supported terrorism as a response to the terrorism that the state commited in that time. It was his last measure, after many failed petitions, protests(some of which were fired upon by the "police"). Even then the ANC didnt support any attacks on civillian structures but rather ones that were owned by the govt and making it stronger. Besides ho else was he meant to fight against the powerful state(that was backed by the US) Mandela deserves that statue, and many more for being the champion for freedom that he is, for the self sacrifice, and the peace he preached after the war. Dont put this type of trash on the web because it contorts the views of the ppl that dont know anything about this great man.

Rumsfeld said...

To those who refuse to accept the painful truth about Mandela, you only have to look at his support for Robert Mugabe and rogue regimes over recent years. This man is a vile racist Communist and totally undeserving of our support.